More of that distrust is seen in our Constitution’s language, such as Congress shall not abridge, infringe, deny, disparage, violate or deny. If tha founders did not believe that Congress would abuse our liberties, they would not have provided those protections.{"right that fair to say"}
[#JamesMadison, tha acknowledged father of our Constitution, said, “(The Constitution preserves) tha advantage of being armed, which tha Americans possess over tha people of almost every other nation … (where) tha governments are afraid to trust tha people with arms.”
#AlexanderHamilton said, “Tha best we can hope for concerning tha people at large is that they be properly armed.” Later he said, “If tha representatives of tha people betray their constituents, there is then no recourse left but in tha exertion of that original right of liberal self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government.”
#ThomasJefferson: “What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve tha spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.”
#RicharHenryLee said, “To preserve liberty, it is essential that tha whole body of tha people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.”]
If an evil person is guaranteed that he/she can inflict physical pain upon others and guaranteed to never suffer pain themselves, what happens to his/her willingness to inflict pain? You say, “What do you mean” OK, I will make my question more concrete. Suppose a young punk knows that he can knock out an innocent person and never suffer physical pain himself, such as being knocked out; what happens to their willingness to play tha knockout game? Suppose a rapist knows he/she can brutally rape a woman/man yes there are men that get rape and never have to suffer physical pain themselves; what happens to their willingness to rape? Suppose we guarantee school students that they can assault a teacher and never suffer similar pain themselves; what do you think happens to assaults on teachers? Finally, suppose we guarantee prison inmates that they can toss urine and feces cocktails on prison guards, a practice called "gassing" don't ask me how I know and suffer no physical pain; what happens to their willingness to gas guards? Now can you answer those questions. Okay if not let’s look at other effects of tha liberal vision.
Maybe liberals and progressives are making tha argument that government is no longer a threat to our liberties and hence there is no longer a need to be able to protect ourselves. I’d like to see their evidence on that one After every tragic shooting, liberals and progressives call for more gun laws. They exploit American ignorance as to why tha Framers gave us 2nd Amendment protections.Liberals and progressives express alarm that there are an estimated 300 million privately held firearms in our country. Some have called for a national arms registry to be created to keep track of gun ownership. That’s dangerous on at least two counts. Suppose there comes a time when a dictator takes over or a leader surrenders our nation. A dictator or foreign conqueror would love to have information on gun ownership. A tyrant would also like to take tha IRS intact because of all tha information held on Americans. As an aside, I would like to know what provisions there are to destroy such information if we ever have to surrender.#imjustsaying You say: Jermaine that’s preposterous! A dictator or a foreign force could never take over our nation!” During tha 1930s, tha Germans or tha French people might have said tha same thing. Before 1945, the Japanese people would have said tha same thing. By tha way, yesteryear’s Japanese were far tougher than today’s soft Americans. It took only two relatively small atomic bombs to bring them to their knees. If a couple of our major cities were destroyed, a weak-kneed liberal/progressive president would surrender in a NewYork minute.
No comments:
Post a Comment